Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <396EE0BA.20437355@cybertec.com.au> Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 19:43:22 +1000 From: Chris Johns Organization: Cybertec Pty Ltd X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12-20 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com" Subject: Re: Have rename() semantics changed? References: <779F20BCCE5AD31186A50008C75D9979171747 AT silldn_mail1 DOT sanwaint DOT com> <779F20BCCE5AD31186A50008C75D9979171747 AT silldn_mail1 DOT sanwaint DOT com> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20000713122755 DOT 01dbc620 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote: > > > According to the MSDN, FILE_SHARE_DELETE is a NT/W2K thingy. That implies > that this functionality is only available there. One would hope that > enabling it doesn't cause 9x to misbehave but who knows. I suppose the > constant could be conditionally compiled in if need be... > This may explain the patch problem I reported not long ago. I think I failed to meantion this was on Win95. -- Chris Johns, mailto:cjohns AT cybertec DOT com DOT au mailto:ccj AT acm DOT org -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com