Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <779F20BCCE5AD31186A50008C75D9979171748@silldn_mail1.sanwaint.com>
From: "Fifer, Eric" <EFifer AT sanwaint DOT com>
To: "'cygwin'" <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Subject: RE: Have rename() semantics changed?
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 17:50:29 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"


Chris Faylor wrote:
>Can you still unlink opened files on Windows 9x, Windows NT, and W2K
>with this change?  I believe that is why I removed this.  Either that
>or it prevented files from being opened.  Sorry that I don't remember.

At least on WinNT, I can unlink an open file when FILE_SHARE_DELETE is
included in the shared flag.  Sorry, I don't have a W2K system handy.
Also, looking at cvsweb, FILE_SHARED_DELETE was only ever used if
os_being_run
was WinNT, so there should be no impact on Win9x.

Thanks,

Eric

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com