Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com From: Michael Meissner Message-ID: <20000712002046.40349@cse.cygnus.com> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 00:20:47 -0400 To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: Win98 hangs building egcs References: <004601bfeb77$ba0b46c0$c7a7b5d4 AT p4kpm> <20000711231236 DOT 44812 AT cse DOT cygnus DOT com> <20000711234253 DOT A32652 AT cygnus DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.84 In-Reply-To: <20000711234253.A32652@cygnus.com>; from Chris Faylor on Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 11:42:53PM -0400 On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 11:42:53PM -0400, Chris Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 11:12:36PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote: > >I haven't seen it under Windows NT 4.0SP5, and I would imagine it probably > >would not show up under Windows 2K, since that is a descendent of NT. Now, the > >upcoming Windows ME release, which is based on the 98 branch, I would suspect > >would show the bug. > > It has yet to be proved that this is a Cygwin bug and not a Windows 9x bug. > > I would love for it to be shown to be a Cygwin bug because then I could fix > it. I can't fix bugs in Windows 9x or Windows ME. I didn't mean to imply that it was a Cygwin bug (hence my speculation that Windows ME would also fail). I suspect Microsoft never envisioned that people would want to do the 50 million create processes (or whatever a full make all, make install, make check winds up eating) between reboots :-) -- Michael Meissner, Red Hat, Inc. PMB 198, 174 Littleton Road #3, Westford, Massachusetts 01886, USA Work: meissner AT redhat DOT com phone: +1 978-486-9304 Non-work: meissner AT spectacle-pond DOT org fax: +1 978-692-4482 -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com