Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From: Michael Ring <Michael DOT Ring AT T-Mobil DOT de>
To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject: Re: Cygwin version confusion
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 16:05:39 +0200
Message-ID: <qmlmlsokkp3d1hcj1du1hgp3fsp76o4h5j@4ax.com>
References: <Cygwin versio...( DDA:RFC-822=cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; O=mb400; OU1=smtp-gwy; P=dtm; A=viat; C=de )>
In-Reply-To: <Cygwin versio...( DDA:RFC-822=cygwin-owner@sourceware.cygnus.com; O=mb400; OU1=smtp-gwy; P=dtm; A=viat; C=de )>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id KAA31564

On Thu, 29 Jun 00 15:39:45 +0100, you wrote:

>Hello,
>
>I'm a little confused regarding the versions of Cygwin and pieces that come
>with the various products/downloads. I originally installed GNUPro Toolkit
>for NT Version 99r1p1.
>
>bash --help -> GNU bash, version 2.02.1(2)-release-(i686-pc-cygwin32)
>uname -r ->    21.0 (0.9/1/2)
>
>I found this installation lacked several utilities (like man.exe) so I
>downloaded and installed (in another directory tree) the latest Cygwin
>setup.exe along with several packages I was interested in (fileutils, groff,
>etc.).	
>
>bash --help -> GNU bash, version 2.04.0(1)-release-(i586-pc-cygwin)
>uname -r    -> 1.1.2(0.21/3/2)
>
>The latest version shows that I'm running a later version of both bash and
>Cygwin. The i586-pc-cygwin bothers me a little. I'm on a PIII machine. I
>don't recall setup allowing me to indicate what type of machine I'm running.
>Did I miss something?

No, this information does not come from your system, this information
describes the system on which bash was compiled (It is burned into the
bash-executeable)

Perhaps bash should be repackaged with i686-pc-cygwin to be in sync
with all the other packages which are normally configured with
i686-pc-cygwin.


Michael Ring

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com