Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 16:25:36 -0400 To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: Compiling in source trees Message-ID: <20000623162536.B27692@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com References: <3953C453 DOT 7FD09C85 AT wanadoo DOT fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <3953C453.7FD09C85@wanadoo.fr>; from gilles.rajaobelina@wanadoo.fr on Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 10:11:00PM +0200 On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 10:11:00PM +0200, Gilles-Claude Rajaobelina wrote: >Sorry if subject has already been discussed and closed here, as I am >new to the list. Am I wrong if I say that compiling in source tree >SHOULD ALSO work? Obviously it doesnt work for winsup. In fact I >never - as possible - compile in source trees, instead I use the lndir >command to produce an image of the source tree and build there >(remember most X packages are recommended to use this scheme). We do not recommend building in the same directory as the source, no. It may work for winsup but it does not work for newlib. You don't have to make symbolic links. You just have to do something like: mkdir build cd build sh /path/to/source/configure make >Why make simple as complicated is so much funnier :)) Oh, we just love to screw you up and mess with your mind. Didn't you know that? cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com