Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-ID: <394E619C.E5EFEA6A@vinschen.de> Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 20:08:28 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen Reply-To: cygwin X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i686) X-Accept-Language: de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Blenke CC: "'cygwin'" Subject: Re: OpenSSH 2.1 to Windows2000 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ian Blenke wrote: > Glad to hear it. It currently seems best to duplicate the > systemwide mounts into the .DEFAULT mounts; otherwise, > inetd does not inherit the appropriate mountpoints and > can't spawn anything correctly. Rather painful, but it > seems to work quite well. No. The right way is creating system mount points as suggested in the various READMEs. > Either way, WinNT TSE and Windows2000 TS have never given > me a problem with drive mappings; even with dozens of users > logged in (each with their own filemappings to the same server). Microsoft TS code is more or less part of the OS so they have possibilities which others only can dream about. > Are you suggesting that 'SYSTEM' is mapping the user drives Oh, I don't suggest that... > before "becoming" the user? This is the only thing that > would immediately describe the symptoms I'm seeing. As I mentioned in my previous mail, there are some sort of oddities. For example a user logged in via local windows logon creates a drive mapping. The same user is logged in via telnet simultaneously. S/He can use that drive in the telnet session but a `net use' doesn't return that drive! That's not normal but that's live! Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Developer Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com