Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-ID: <3949EC1E.82BB41FB@dddandr.octacon.co.uk> Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 09:58:06 +0100 From: Don Sharp Reply-To: dwsharp AT iee DOT org X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnuwin32 Subject: Re: /usr/bin and /usr/lib mount points (WAS: RE: telnet problems with current cygwin version) References: <20000615130755 DOT 20768 DOT qmail AT web113 DOT yahoomail DOT com> <005501bfd70b$619cc7a0$a8a11dcb AT ihug DOT co DOT nz> <200006152101 DOT RAA14784 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DJ Delorie wrote: > > > But why are they mount points instead of ordinary directories? Normal > > Because we never know whether a program should go in /bin or /usr/bin, > so the mounts make all programs appear in both places. > Please put this in the installation notes and/or the FAQ. I had been wondering why the recommendation from Earnie was so strongly voiced. Now I understand. I have ash, bash, sh and cygwin as the only entries in /bin and the shells are also present in /usr/bin. On balance I agree the mount makes more sense for Cygwin. Thanks Don Sharp > -- > Want to unsubscribe from this list? > Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com