Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2000 14:14:17 EDT
X-Mailer: Virtual Access by Atlantic Coast PLC, http://www.soft-shop.com
Message-Id: <VA.0000042d.00e38907@bk-satellite>
To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject: Re: Setup didn't update me to cygwin 1.1.2
In-Reply-To: <20000608201044.B12917@cygnus.com>
From: Brian Keener <bkeener AT thesoftwaresource DOT com>
Reply-To: bkeener AT thesoftwaresource DOT com

Chris Faylor wrote:
> In other words, you did exactly what I warned against in my email announcing
> 1.1.2.  I mentioned that the '-u' option would not update a snapshot and
> cautioned people not to use it.  You used it.

You are correct (as you well knew).  I actually missed you e-mail announcing 
1.1.2 and simply saw e-mails referring to 1.1.2 and thought - hey that may fix 
whatever I have screwed up as it was mentioned it resolved a lot more of the 
/r/n concerns which I knew I had some of.  Went back and found your email and 
read it see the error of my ways - thanks for pointing me to my goof and I do 
me that!

Further question though on this - if I now do this correctly (dare I??) Will 
that then cause my cygcheck -s -r -v to show my cygwin is on 1.1.2 as opposed 
to 1.1.1 as it now does?

> I don't see how this could have anything to do with cygwin.  It looks
> like you have to investigate header files and see what to include to
> get a declaration for InitCommonControls.

I didn't mean to imply it had anything to do with cygwin - other than it had 
compiled on B20 and would not now compile on 1.1.1 and thought someone with 
more knowledge than a newbie like me might have run up on it.  I was also 
hoping someone could point me to the default mount points for B20 so I could 
try to compile again under B20 to see if it would still compile there.

Thanks for your help and pointing me to me errors and I apologize for the 
compile problem and any insinuation it was a cygwin problem.  I just thought 
someone could help - anyone got any suggestions for where that question might 
have been better asked?

Thanks again Chris.

Brian




This e-mail contains privileged and confidential information solely for the use of the addressee.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of the message and its content is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please notify use immediately by telephone or e-mail.  
Mailto:Administrator AT FultonPaper DOT com 

Thank you.



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com