Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: "Prentis Brooks" To: "Cygwin" Subject: Further joys in the realm of sshd... Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 10:28:18 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal And here I thought I had it licked. Ok, I have a series of 3 user types. first user -> Master User, used for executing automated scripts, needs shosts authentication second user -> Standard Users, shell access to host, password authentication third user -> Special Guest, shell access, but only read in certain directories, needs shosts/RSA authentication My current configuration seems to work for users one and two, no problem since sshd is run from inetd as the first user with two separate config files, one for RSA on one port and the second for password on another. Now to accomplish the third requirement, I need to run sshd on a third port as that user. The problem I am encountering is that sshd dies with the following error: sshd: no RSA support in libssl and libcrypto -- exiting. See ssl(8) I can't find the ssl(8) reference. The command I am using to get this is: sshd -p 29 -d and I do that as the third user, if I execute it as my user (a Domain Admin) it works... I also tried making the third user a Domain admin to see if it made a diff, it doesn't. Any ideas as to why that user can't find the correct libs when another can. (NOTE: with exception of home directory, files are owned by master user and group Domain Users, of which users 2 and 3 are members and since user 2 <> user 1, then it should not be an ownership problem.) Also, one other key diff between users 1, 2, and 3 is that of the 3 only #3 does not have the rights to become another user. But as long as I am not doing password authentication, he shouldn't need it, right? Prentis -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com