Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 13:22:17 -0400 From: Chris Faylor To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: CygUtils Version of zip (and Symlinks) Message-ID: <20000525132217.A2044@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com References: <200005251558 DOT IAA25370 AT cygnus DOT com> <20000525120553 DOT E1330 AT cygnus DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <20000525120553.E1330@cygnus.com>; from cgf@cygnus.com on Thu, May 25, 2000 at 12:05:53PM -0400 On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 12:05:53PM -0400, Chris Faylor wrote: >On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 10:56:53AM -0500, Parker, Ron wrote: >>This may be more a question for cygwin-developers, but I hate crossposts and >>know most readers of that list at least review this one. So, wouldn't it be >>appropriate when compiling without -mno-cygwin for the specs file to define >>"unix", "UNIX" and similar "standard" defines? They seem to be checked for >>in newlib, zlib, X11, and many other sources? > >I don't see why it would be appropriate to define UNIX when you're specifying >a command line option that says "This is not UNIX". So, no, I don't believe >that this is appropriate. I don't even know that newlib will build correctly >with -mno-cygwin. Sorry. I misread what was written above. It does make sense to define these and, in fact, I am fairly certain that they used to be defined. Apologies for the misinterpretation. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com