Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From: Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 12:05:53 -0400
To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject: Re: CygUtils Version of zip (and Symlinks)
Message-ID: <20000525120553.E1330@cygnus.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
References: <200005251558 DOT IAA25370 AT cygnus DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To: <200005251558.IAA25370@cygnus.com>; from rdparker@butlermfg.com on Thu, May 25, 2000 at 10:56:53AM -0500

On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 10:56:53AM -0500, Parker, Ron wrote:
>This may be more a question for cygwin-developers, but I hate crossposts and
>know most readers of that list at least review this one.  So, wouldn't it be
>appropriate when compiling without -mno-cygwin for the specs file to define
>"unix", "UNIX" and similar "standard" defines?  They seem to be checked for
>in newlib, zlib, X11, and many other sources?

I don't see why it would be appropriate to define UNIX when you're specifying
a command line option that says "This is not UNIX".  So, no, I don't believe
that this is appropriate.  I don't even know that newlib will build correctly
with -mno-cygwin.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com