Message-Id: <200005251634.MAA02732@delorie.com> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: "Parker, Ron" To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: UN*X defines (WAS: RE: CygUtils Version of zip (and Symlinks)) Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 11:33:24 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01BFC666.F994CF4A" ------_=_NextPart_000_01BFC666.F994CF4A Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" > Well actually, I've wondered about adding unix and linux and 'similar > "standard" defines' myself. What would you consider "standard"? That't why I quoted "standard". AFAIK there are no standards for defines to indicate that a program is being built on a UN*X system. I have just noticed over the years that many packages use UNIX, unix, or some permutation with underscores to check for a UN*X operating system. ------_=_NextPart_000_01BFC666.F994CF4A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com ------_=_NextPart_000_01BFC666.F994CF4A--