Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Date: 17 May 2000 13:09:53 +0000
Discarded-X400-MTS-Extensions: (43) (12) (2) (135) (115) (5) (6) (3)
From: "Michael Ring" <Michael DOT Ring AT t-mobil DOT de>
To: "cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com" <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject: Re: New Cygwin DLL 1.1.1
Importance: normal
Autoforwarded: FALSE
Message-Id: <D821ILT399G3*@MHS>
Original-Encoded-Information-Types: (1) (0) (10021) (7) (1) (0) (6), (1) (0) (10021) (7) (1) (0) (1)

On Wed, 17 May 00 14:19:29 +0100, you wrote:

>Hallo Christopher,
>
>I have a lot of problems with cygwin on NT4.0 (SR5) german:
>
>One on our Software Projects (on True64/Digital Alpha)	
>uses egcs 1.1.2. Now we are porting our software to Linux and NT.
>The NT port is my part...
>The last cygwin version contains gcc.2.95 .	
>Different compilers think different about c++  and
>so i tried to compile egcs-1.1.2 on NT.
>This failed: the compilation failed in stage2 (or so)
>the xgcc in Stage2 (or was it stage 1 ?) failed and
>printed an ugly message	
>
>Q: Do you know about this problem ? Can	
>   you build an egcs-1.1.2-Compiler (give me the binaries ;-) )
>

Did you use 'plain' egcs or a version with the patches from mummit khan. I
compiled egcs-1.1.2 with Mummit's patches on a cygwin-snapshot a few months ago
and everything worked fine.


Michael Ring

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com