Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From: Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 18:50:38 -0400
To: "'cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com'" <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject: Re: info & Setup & RPM
Message-ID: <20000504185038.A22593@cygnus.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cgf AT cygnus DOT com,
	"'cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com'" <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
References: <20000504110727 DOT A15094 AT cygnus DOT com> <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 10005050829170 DOT 28346-100000 AT asyoulikeit DOT ems DOT uq DOT edu DOT au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.12i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10005050829170.28346-100000@asyoulikeit.ems.uq.edu.au>; from david@ems.uq.edu.au on Fri, May 05, 2000 at 08:34:31AM +1000

On Fri, May 05, 2000 at 08:34:31AM +1000, David O'Shea wrote:
>On Thu, 4 May 2000, Chris Faylor wrote:
>> Actually, by default setup.exe installs everything.  If someone chooses not
>> to install a complete installation and then is surprised when they do
>> an "info gcc" and find that gcc is not available, I'm not going to be
>> incredibly sympathetic.
>> 
>> However, if you want to submit a patch to setup.c, I'll certainly consider
>> it.
>
>I checked a few RPMs from Red Hat Linux (now I've learned that there's a
>space in Red Hat) and noted that they just have postinstall scripts that
>run install-info.  Maybe a similar sort of thing could be done here,
>except just by having a special file in the .tar.gz file which setup
>executes (and which can do any kind of specialised setup that is required
>for that package).  Does anyone know if the FreeBSD or Slackware package
>formats (both use .tar.gz, right?) have any sort of feature like this?
>Maybe a port of pkg_add or something would be useful, then (I seem to
>remember seeing something about that in the archives).
>
>..or maybe we could have a custom version of the Red Hat installer (okay,
>sorry, I know I shouldn't make suggestions like that unless I've got the
>time to do it myself!).

Especially after quoting a message where I tried to subtly make this very
point...

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com