Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com> List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/> List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com> List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs> Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com> Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 14:33:15 -0400 To: "cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com" <cygwin AT hotpop DOT com> Subject: Re: Things you can do with Cygwin Message-ID: <20000503143315.A7473@cygnus.com> Mail-Followup-To: cgf AT cygnus DOT com, "cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com" <cygwin AT hotpop DOT com> References: <20000503174356 DOT 9609 DOT qmail AT web111 DOT yahoomail DOT com> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20000503135318 DOT 00e01b30 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.12i In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.2.20000503135318.00e01b30@pop.ma.ultranet.com>; from lhall@rfk.com on Wed, May 03, 2000 at 02:01:40PM -0400 On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 02:01:40PM -0400, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote: >At 01:43 PM 5/3/00, Earnie Boyd wrote: >>--- "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com> wrote: >>-8<- >>>Perhaps its worthwhile, if people want to discuss the GPL and its >>>details, and offer their opinions on its interpretation, that this >>>discussion move to a forum that discusses such things. I'm not sure >>>that this list's bandwidth is best consumed by those offering their >>>interpretation of the GPL when there are other places where such things >>>are addressed. Just a thought... >>> >> >>I would agree; however, this is a discussion not only of the GPL but >>how the GPL affects CYGWIN and my program that uses it. This then is >>beneficial to this list. > >OK, I stand corrected. If this discussion stays on target and >addresses how the GPL version of CYGWIN affects someone's program and >that differs from how the GPL would affect that program if it used some >other GPLed library, then I would agree that continued discussion >should remain on this list. If the discussion becomes one of various >people offering their opinion of what the GPL means and what it >affects, it seems beneficial to move that branch of the discussion to a >more appropriate venue. I agree. The discussion is getting pretty philosophical, which, IMO, is a sure sign that it is getting off-topic for this mailing list. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com