Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20000503114405.00df6720@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
X-Sender: lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1
Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 11:48:46 -0400
To: Charles Hixson <charleshixsn AT earthlink DOT net>,
        "cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com" <cygwin AT hotpop DOT com>
From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>
Subject: Re: Things you can do with Cygwin
In-Reply-To: <39104624.CF876E7E@earthlink.net>
References: <Pine DOT SOL DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000502124908 DOT 7998T-100000 AT cse DOT cygnus DOT com>
 <200005022020 DOT QAA22623 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"


At 11:30 AM 5/3/00, Charles Hixson wrote:
>DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> > ...(snip)
> > > The static linking case is clear.
> >
> > Agreed.
> >
> > > Dynamic linking is not so clear, it is likely covered by the GPL but
> > > who knows for sure.
> >
> > My claim is that the fact that it's dynamically linked is irrelevent;
> > all that is relevent is whether there are two independent works
> > involved, or only one.
>
>... (snip)
>
>And this is the area of disagreement.  I feel that since a dynamically
>linked chunk of code only specifies the interface, and not the internals,
>that the internals are not parts of the same work.  In particular it is
>certainly possible to have multiple hunks of code with the same name and
>effectively the same interface (minor variations may exist) because that
>is the source of windows "dll hell".  If there can be multiple versions
>that do very different things, after the manner of things returned by a
>factory pattern, then I don't see them as being the same work at all.  And
>since the caller doesn't know which of the different versions it will get,
>it can't be a part of the same work either.
>
>IANAL.  But this is my opinion.
>



Perhaps its worthwhile, if people want to discuss the GPL and its details,
and offer their opinions on its interpretation, that this discussion move
to a forum that discusses such things.  I'm not sure that this list's 
bandwidth is best consumed by those offering their interpretation of the GPL
when there are other places where such things are addressed.  Just a 
thought...



Larry Hall                              lhall AT rfk DOT com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      http://www.rfk.com
118 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
Holliston, MA 01746                     (508) 893-9889 - FAX
                                        (508) 560-1285 - cell phone



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com