Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 18:19:56 +0300 From: Paul Sokolovsky X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.32) S/N A9B97A11 Reply-To: Paul Sokolovsky X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <15763.000503@is.lg.ua> To: DJ Delorie CC: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re[2]: Status of availability of features which allow correct and seamless support of DLLs in current GNU-Win32 releases In-reply-To: <200005031430.KAA25162@envy.delorie.com> References: <200005031430 DOT KAA25162 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello DJ, Wednesday, May 03, 2000, 5:30:55 PM, you wrote: >> Ha, that's the effect of stereotypes! DD> Well, you can invent your own way of doing it, but that's not the way DD> everyone else does it. We support the way Microsoft does it. If you DD> want to do something else, go for it. So do I - support Microsoft way. Besides that, I also support everyone else's way. (Obviuosly, we refer to different everyone elses). But I hope you agree that it would be nice if cygwin can build some shared package out-of-box? Best regards, Paul mailto:paul-ml AT is DOT lg DOT ua -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com