Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 18:46:40 -0400 From: kevh AT cgocable DOT net To: Kendall Bennett Cc: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: Lack of Cygwin contributors? Was: How is textmode/binmode determined ... Message-ID: <20000502184640.A8254@cgocable.net> References: <200005021235673 DOT SM00160 AT KENDALLB> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20000502153727 DOT 00de3ca0 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <200005021343357 DOT SM00160 AT KENDALLB> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0i In-Reply-To: <200005021343357.SM00160@KENDALLB>; from KendallB@scitechsoft.com on Tue, May 02, 2000 at 01:42:32PM -0800 On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 01:42:32PM -0800, Kendall Bennett wrote: >[...] > If I assign my copyright for a piece of code to someone else, I lose > *ALL* rights to that code and *CANNOT* use that code myself for my > own purposes. [...] Since you are modifying and distributing GPL'ed code under the terms of the GPL, you retain *all* the rights and obligations granted and required by that license. Your complaint, then, can only be that by being required to assign your copyright to Cygnus, you no longer posses the right to *relicense* your code under *non-GPL* terms, while Cygnus does. That is essentially the same gripe that advocates of BSD/XFree-style licenses have have against the GPL for ages. So, unless you're arguing that the GPL is flawed in general and Cygnus/RedHat therefore shouldn't be releasing software that uses it (like Gnome, the Linux kernel, gcc, etc.), I'm not sure if you've thought your argument all the way through. -Kevin -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com