Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-ID: <390EFC6A.E7B0D281@earthlink.net> Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 09:03:54 -0700 From: Charles Hixson X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: Lack of Cygwin contributors? Was: How is textmode/binmode determined ... References: <390CB60E DOT 77861554 AT gingerspice DOT demon DOT co DOT uk> <200005011535256 DOT SM00160 AT KENDALLB> <20000501184950 DOT A9303 AT cygnus DOT com> <200005020005 DOT UAA19448 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DJ Delorie wrote: > > That's absolutely right. We own Cygwin. The FSF, as I understand it, > > was actually not interested in the product. > > I don't think the FSF wants to end up owning the world of free > software, either. There are a lot of GPL'd projects, the FSF owns a > very tiny percentage of them. They just happen to own some of the > most visible ones. > > -- > Want to unsubscribe from this list? > Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com If I were guessing (I am), then I would guess that the FSF wasn't very interested in getting mixed up with a proprietary OS. Seems to me that that's a reasonable position for them to take. CygWin is sort of the opposite of WINE (which I would also guess they wouldn't be too interested in). OTOH, since both of these projects aim at bringing freedom into a formerly locked area, neither of them is exactly something the FSF shouldn't be involved with. I would guess that this is a matter of choosing the allocation of resources. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com