Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-ID: <20000501193946.27666.qmail@daffy.airs.com>
Mail-Followup-To: libtool AT gnu DOT org,
  cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com,
  mingw32 AT egroups DOT com,
  paul-ml AT is DOT lg DOT ua
Date: 1 May 2000 12:39:46 -0700
From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian AT zembu DOT com>
To: paul-ml AT is DOT lg DOT ua
CC: libtool AT gnu DOT org, cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com, mingw32 AT egroups DOT com
In-reply-to: <3888.000430@is.lg.ua> (message from Paul Sokolovsky on Sun, 30
	Apr 2000 21:18:58 +0300)
Subject: Re: Status of availability of features which allow correct and seamless support of DLLs in current GNU-Win32 releases
References:  <3888 DOT 000430 AT is DOT lg DOT ua>

   Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 21:18:58 +0300
   From: Paul Sokolovsky <paul-ml AT is DOT lg DOT ua>

     O, I used to ask Mumit Khan why he distributes such outdated,
   19990818 binutils for mingw32, and got answer that there's bad
   attitudes of binutils maintainers towards pe frontend. Now, when
   official Cygnus release contains the same, I see that's true...

I don't think that's a fair characterization of the situation.

Ian

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com