Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 11:57:59 -0400 To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: [mingw] Status of availability of features which allow correct and seamless support of DLLs in current GNU-Win32 releases Message-ID: <20000501115759.B5238@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cgf AT cygnus DOT com, cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com References: <11467 DOT 000501 AT is DOT lg DOT ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.12i In-Reply-To: <11467.000501@is.lg.ua>; from paul-ml@is.lg.ua on Mon, May 01, 2000 at 11:13:44AM +0300 On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 11:13:44AM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > I cannot talk reasonably about something being wrong about PE >with binutils simply because I never tried to submit patch directly, >so cannot say that something was rejected. Moreover, look at binutils >maillist shows that, if maintainers allocate theit time proportionally >to requests, that PE really don't get top priority. Actually, I monitor the binutils mailing list and I don't see much traffic about PE. That is really irrelevant, though, since the volunteers who maintain binutils are free to spend their time however they wish. I've noticed some improvement in PE handling in current sourceware snapshots, so maybe there is hope on this front. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com