Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 00:06:31 -0400 Message-Id: <200005010406.AAA28094@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: sherlock_abc AT netzero DOT net CC: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com In-reply-to: <000201bfb2c3$db0b9740$b9763004@default> (sherlock_abc AT netzero DOT net) Subject: Re: Setup v1.34 & root installation References: <000201bfb2c3$db0b9740$b9763004 AT default> > but I think faster than i can type and program, Everyone does. It's physically impossible to do otherwise. That doesn't excuse you from reviewing what you type to make sure it's correct. > I type at 20 wps, too slow. I type about 70 wps, my wife even faster. Speed has nothing to do with accuracy; you should always proof what you write before you send it. By your own logic, you should be a *better* typer, as you have more time to think about what you type. > All I know is I have to tab in Word take make 10 white spaces or something Don't use Word for programming. Use a text editor, not a word processor. Better yet, use a programming editor, like emacs or vi. > DOS has no binary mode, until now. DOS has *always* had binary mode. I recall using it in DOS 1.0. It's the *only* mode the disk has; "text mode" is an abberation convened by the applications themselves. > We have emacs and all these other text editors. Why not create a > text editor designed for Cygwin? You mean, besides emacs and vi? > why not take advantage of Windows GUI? Why not? Go ahead. Nobody is stopping you. In fact, why not make your job easier by starting with one of the existing IDEs, like DFE95? -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com