Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-ID: <1DB8BA4BAC88D3118B2300508B5A552C0C8CDD@mail.fitlinxx.com> From: David Bolen To: "'cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com'" Subject: RE: How is textmode/binmode determined in Cygwin 1.1.0 net releas e for pipes? Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 00:54:50 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" This'll be my only follow-up on this theme, but I hope I wasn't misunderstood - my original request was to help identify behavior I saw. Asking a population that includes experts in the system if someone can identify an issue is not asking someone else to do something for me - it's attempting to mine a collective mindset and intelligencia. In this case "anyone else has done it first" includes having already run into and dealt with a similar issue. And BTW, in the event that no-one had responded, after some reasonable period of time I would have to conclude that such information was not available from the community I had asked, and would have went on to other avenues (which I probably would have used in parallel anyway). Ah well, it sure seemed like a simple request - sorry if anyone took it the wrong way. -- David -----Original Message----- From: simon DOT p DOT cozens AT jp DOT pwcglobal DOT com [mailto:simon DOT p DOT cozens AT jp DOT pwcglobal DOT com] Sent: Friday, April 28, 2000 12:43 AM To: 'cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com' Subject: RE: How is textmode/binmode determined in Cygwin 1.1.0 net releas e for pipes? David Bolen wrote: >In terms of your observation, I should point out that the best way to handle >things is to find a reference (someone or something) that already has the >answer, and thus minimize the amount of work you have to do - laziness being >one of a developer's hallmarks. You misunderstand the nature of the developer's laziness. Laziness is about minimizing the time you have to spend, before - and hopefully instead of - wasting other people's. Bad laziness says "I'll get someone else to do this for me." Good laziness says "I'll see if anyone else has done it first." By your definition of laziness, nobody would have bothered responding to your mail. Simon __END__ ---------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com