Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-ID: <390493FD.9179689C@veritas.com> Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 11:35:41 -0700 From: Bob McGowan Organization: VERITAS Software X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com CC: Cygwin Mailing List Subject: Re: How to change "/" from textmode to binmode? References: <20000424181531 DOT 12173 DOT qmail AT web118 DOT yahoomail DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Earnie Boyd wrote: > > --- Richard Stanton wrote: > > Following up on the exchange below, I find I can't change / back from text > > to binmode, mainly because I can't unmount it, even though umount doesn't > > complain: > > > > c:\>umount / > > > > c:\>mount > > Device Directory Type Flags > > c:\cygnus\usr /usr user binmode > > c:\cygnus\bin /usr/bin user binmode > > c:\cygnus\lib /usr/lib user binmode > > \\.\tape0: /dev/st0 user textmode > > \\.\tape1: /dev/st1 user textmode > > \\.\a: /dev/fd0 user textmode > > \\.\b: /dev/fd1 user textmode > > C: / user textmode > > > > c:\> > > > > How can I change / from textmode back to binmode if I want to do so? > > > > Gee, I haven't seen this discussed for months/years. The reason that it > appears you can't umount / is simple. The initialization of the Cygwin1.dll > will create the / directory mount if it doesn't exist. You actually do remove > the entry for / with the umount; however, when you do mount to check to see if > it's gone it gets added back during the initialization. This has been resolved > by today's version of mount which uses a -f switch to replace the existing > entry. I.E.: mount -f -b c:/ / would add make c:/ the root with binary mode > processing as the default. > > Cheers, In an earlier response to the original question, Chris Faylor suggested using 'mount -?' to get descriptions of options and that one of these should help. So I was trying out mount with different options, in different ways, and came up with a new issue. It appears that I can create an environment where / is mounted on 2 different locations, one stored at the system level and one at the user. It would seem to me to make sense that 'mount' should not allow duplicates of system level mount points at the user level. Is this a valid conclusion? -- Bob McGowan Staff Software Quality Engineer VERITAS Software rmcgowan AT veritas DOT com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com