Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From: "Richard Stanton" <stanton AT haas DOT berkeley DOT edu>
To: "Tim Prince" <tprince AT computer DOT org>
Cc: "Cygwin Mailing List" <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject: RE: New net release - problems with make and gdb
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2000 23:55:23 -0700
Message-ID: <000001bfacf0$e6100000$1acc90c6@berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <00e201bfaceb$cb305e60$0100000a@TIMYX18EWDT6RQ>

That was it. Thanks.

After installing the new release, c: was mounted (as /) in binmode, whereas
previously it had been mounted in text mode. Changing the mount back to
textmode allows make to run properly.

Having said all that, I get the impression from this group that I "ought" to
be mounting everything in binmode. Is this correct? If so, why?

Thanks a lot.

Richard Stanton


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Prince [mailto:tprince AT computer DOT org]
> Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2000 11:18 PM
> To: Richard Stanton; cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
> Subject: Re: New net release - problems with make and gdb
>
>
> That too looks like some mixup relative to binary and text
> mounts.  I managed to introduce text mounts where there were
> none on my first installation attempt.  Again on my third
> attempt, trying to install under W95 on a dual boot machine with
> the net release already installed successfully on NTFS under
> W2K.  But on the working installation I haven't seen any make
> failures, using makefiles which never ran consistently before in
> any form of Windows.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard Stanton" <stanton AT haas DOT berkeley DOT edu>
> To: <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
> Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2000 10:35 PM
> Subject: New net release - problems with make and gdb
>
>
> > I've just installed the new net release. Two problems so far:
> >
> > 1) gdb - minor: If I type, at the command line, "gdb
> progname", nothing
> > seems to happen. It works OK in an EMACS window. Also, why is
> the gdb
> > program/archive so huge?
> >
> > 2) make - major, as it means all my makefiles don't work: I
> have a makefile
> > that starts:
> >
> > DEBUGFLAG= 0
> >
> > ifeq ($(DEBUGFLAG),1)
> > CFLAGS= -Wall -g -mno-cygwin -I/projects/h
> > [etc.]
> >
> > This used to run fine under the old release, but now when I
> run make I get
> > the error messages:
> >
> > c:\projects\xll>make rhs.xll
> > makefile:6: Extraneous text after `ifeq' directive
> > makefile:10: Extraneous text after `else' directive
> > makefile:14: Extraneous text after `endif' directive
> > makefile:30: *** commands commence before first target.  Stop.
> >
> > Note: line 6 is the one with the ifeq command in it.
> >
> > Richard Stanton
> >
> >
> > --
> > Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> > Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
> >
>
>


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com