Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 19:27:24 -0400 To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin 1.1.0 gdb troubles Message-ID: <20000419192724.A17027@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cgf AT cygnus DOT com, cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com References: <200004191421 DOT KAA22811 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <0925 DOT 000419 AT is DOT lg DOT ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.8i In-Reply-To: <0925.000419@is.lg.ua>; from paul-ml@is.lg.ua on Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 10:13:02PM +0300 On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 10:13:02PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: >>> Almost any POSIX feature maps one-to-one to win32 one and difference >>> is only in some idiosyncratic details. > >DD> This is an understatement. For every feature that maps one-to-one, it >DD> seems like there are a dozen idiosyncratic details that make it >DD> difficult to meet the POSIX requirements. A large portion of Cygwin >DD> is devoted to these details. > > Well, we won't argue on precise number of details and level of >difficulty to work them around. Nope. We'll just make vague assertions that cygwin could do it much better and that will be that. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com