Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-ID: <38F61023.875A9F9E@sigma6.com> Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 14:21:23 -0400 From: Jeff Sturm Organization: AppNet X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.10 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: ELF-binaries under NT? References: <5D2A198567EED311BD0F009027A25C870D7EBD AT SRVMAIL-ANN> <20000413120333 DOT B12426 AT cygnus DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Chris Faylor wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2000 at 04:10:29PM +0200, William Gacquer wrote: > >I don't agree with you DJ, I once got a a small application running on > >windows thanks to an elf loader. I'll search it again on the internet and > >send the URL ASAP. > > I would be *extremely* surprised if you could get any application running > that was compiled on linux. You'd have to emulate every single linux > system call for this to work. It's not the system calls that are a problem. You'd have to have the complete glibc ported to Windows. Most applications never perform system calls directly. It's an interesting idea, but off-topic for this list. -- Jeff Sturm jsturm AT sigma6 DOT com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com