Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-ID: <38F38A7C.E70A3A0E@inspirepharm.com> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:26:36 -0400 From: "Suhaib M. Siddiqi" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.9 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: DJ Delorie CC: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: Mirosoft Interix contains Cygwin References: <38F38038 DOT D38F8BA8 AT inspirepharm DOT com> <200004112013 DOT QAA23503 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Well, Ok stolen is the wrong word. But no I cannot find the sources to any GPL and LGPL on their site. May be I am missing some tiny tiny download somewhere. If you could find any source on the following link, let me know please... so far I would classify their ports of GNU products as a violation of GPL because I did not receive code with my MSDN subscription CD, I do not find code on MSDN Subscriber downlaod site and I also do not find code at the link they say in ther License.txt (GPL.txt) file.... http://www.microsoft.com/windows/sfu I understand they can include GCC, G&& and all the other GNUish tools but where is the code. The GNU license included with MSDN cd is dates June 1991. Is not their a more recent GNU GPL? Thanks Suhaib DJ Delorie wrote: > > The April 2000 distribution of MSDN Universal Subscription contains > > Microsoft Interix 2.2. > > Cool! Now even Microsoft is seeing the benefits of open source software. > > > Burried way inside c:\Interix\usr\contriblib\gcc-lib\i386-pc-opennt is a > > directory called > > "cygnus-2.7.2-970404". What actually it looks to me a GCC compiler > > stolen from Cygwin B19 stock distribution. > > "Stolen" is the wrong word. Remember, the whole point of the GPL is > to guarantee the *right* to copy such software. Such guarantees work > equally for everyone - from the most prolific open source programmers > to the most rabid proprietary vendors. If Microsoft wants to copy and > redistribute GPL'd software for their own benefit, that's fine - as > long as they play by the same rules everyone else plays by. > > Plus, the i386-pc-opennt directory means that they *had* to rebuild > gcc from source, targetting their system. This means that there are > now five wintel gccs - emx, djgpp, cygwin, mingw, and now interix. > The cygwin-* directory is just the version number, and there's no > reason why they couldn't start with sources from an old cygwin. > > > During installation it poped 20 GPL and LGPL warnings and said if > > you need code go to Interix side and download... no code on the MSDN > > Subscription download or Distribution CD itself... is not it the GPL > > violation itself? > > I don't think so, as long as you *can* get the code off the web. I > think the FSF now allows web sites to fulfill the source requirement, > as long as the web site is run by the company distributing the > binaries. I've heard rumors that the next GPL will allow this > explicitly, but that was a while ago... > > But, if they are making sources available on the web, then they're > following the GPL more than the people we had to grant cygwin > exceptions to for binary-only distributions of "popular" packages. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com