Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 16:36:13 -0400 From: Chris Faylor To: Tim Prince Cc: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: ezmlm warning Message-ID: <20000410163613.A10744@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Mail-Followup-To: Chris Faylor , Tim Prince , cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com References: <955193687 DOT 11707 DOT ezmlm-warn AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com> <38F18C2B DOT C5B65602 AT dddandr DOT octacon DOT co DOT uk> <8ct228$obl$1 AT cronkite DOT cygnus DOT com> <006301bfa32a$cbeeec10$5f0f4dd1 AT TIMYX18EWDT6RQ> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.8i In-Reply-To: <006301bfa32a$cbeeec10$5f0f4dd1@TIMYX18EWDT6RQ>; from tprince@computer.org on Mon, Apr 10, 2000 at 01:24:33PM -0700 Note-from-DJ: This may be spam This has nothing to do with ORBS. It looks like a standard "we don't relay" filter. cgf On Mon, Apr 10, 2000 at 01:24:33PM -0700, Tim Prince wrote: >My ISP (Pacbell) was using some kind of spam filter to reject list messages >for more than a day. That seems to have been corrected, but they still >refuse to acknowledge the need to get off the ORBS blacklist. > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Chris Faylor" >Newsgroups: cygnus.gnu-win32 >To: >Sent: Monday, April 10, 2000 10:12 AM >Subject: Re: ezmlm warning > > >> It is not at all clear that this is a routing fault. When an email >> message is bounced back with a "MAILER-DAEMON" warning that begins with >> a "5", it indicates that the email could not be delivered. >> >> If you are still getting the email anyway then something in your setup >> is odd. >> >> Something in the setup for the IP address 158.43.128.40 (which is >> relay.pipex.net) does not like relaying cygwin mailing list news to you. >> I don't know why. >> >> In article <38F18C2B DOT C5B65602 AT dddandr DOT octacon DOT co DOT uk>, >> Don Sharp wrote: >> > >> >Sorry to have to post this to the list, but I haven't seen a list >> >manager address. >> > >> >It should be clear that the problems below are a routing fault, not one >> >of inaccessible addresses, because the sensing message reaches me OK. >> >Please amend your package to tell the difference. >> >> --- Enclosed is a copy of the bounce message I received. >> >> >> >> Return-Path: <> >> >> Received: (qmail 29995 invoked for bounce); 27 Mar 2000 17:02:33 -0000 >> >> Date: 27 Mar 2000 17:02:33 -0000 >> >> From: MAILER-DAEMON AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com >> >> To: cygwin-return-9165- AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com >> >> Subject: failure notice >> >> >> >> Hi. This is the qmail-send program at sourceware.cygnus.com. >> >> I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following >addresses. >> >> This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. >> >> >> >> : >> >> 158.43.128.40 does not like recipient. >> >> Remote host said: 553 Sorry, you can't relay through me (#5.7.1) >> >> Giving up on 158.43.128.40. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com