Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 10:39:23 -0800 Subject: Re: PLEASE help with V1.0 canonical mode problem From: "James Grishaw" To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com CC: jgrishaw AT onebox DOT com Message-Id: <20000328183923.XXUS21091.mta01.onebox.com@onebox.com> >>I notice that if I use a later snapshot version of cygwin1.dll, the problem >>disappears. Is there a snapshot version of cygwin1.dll that Cygnus feels >>is pretty stable that I could be using to get around this bug? > >The "later snapshot" is the correct fix for the problem. What, exactly, is >wrong with using a snapshot? > >cgf > Chris, I guess the notes that Cygnus includes on the snapshot web page summarize my concerns: " These snapshots have not been tested. These are automatically built and packaged each night. The only guarantee is that it built on my machine (there is no snapshot if the build fails). " And... " Cygwin snapshots are intended for cygwin developers only unless you have been specifically told to try one of these. " Chris, I trying to set up some folks at Agilent (formerly HP) with some software running under Cygwin. We are currently in the alpha testing stage. If this works out it could potentially roll out to a much larger number of users, and these by and large are NOT programmer types. It is going to be very inconvenient to not be able backspace over type-o's while running ftp in an xterm. Also, there are a number of shell scripts that prompt for user input (using bash's "read" built-in) where the same problem occurs. We all bought the CD with the idea that (a) it had undergone testing to assure that it is stable and bug-free, and (b) people that bought the CD would be given at least a little preference when it came to support. I would very much like this to turn out to be a positive experience for everyone. Can you please pass this e-mail on to the engineer that fixed the canonical mode problem and ask him to see if he can work out a patch for V1.0? I'm even willing to donate engineering time to the task. If you can't do the above, can you at least have him send me an e-mail pointing me in the right direction so I can do it myself? I volunteer to supply you with my work when I am done. Many thanks for your consideration, Jim Grishaw. -- James Grishaw jgrishaw AT onebox DOT com - email (408) 380-2271 x1143 - voicemail/fax __________________________________________________ FREE voicemail, email, and fax...all in one place. Sign Up Now! http://www.onebox.com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com