Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-ID: <38DFACC8.572943F1@vinschen.de> Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 20:47:36 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen Reply-To: cygwin X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: de,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin Subject: Re: about the id -Gn References: <38DB89A2 DOT 131CADE1 AT cnen DOT de DOT edf DOT fr> <38DBB0E3 DOT A0322DF4 AT vinschen DOT de> <38DF7E62 DOT 33A313F8 AT cnen DOT de DOT edf DOT fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Frederic Lorrain wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >[...] > > by NT/W2K. The insertion of supplementary groups in /etc/groups > > is only a help/hint for you. There's no command `newgroup' and > > there's no need for it in NT/W2K. > > > [...] > Actually, any NT4.0 users may have several groups. So, why does the > command "mkgroup" extract only the primary group of each user ? Simply because it's written to do it that way. As I mentioned, it has no additional effect to write them into /etc/groups so it's not really on top of the TODO stack. But I wouldn't dislike a patch to it... > Even if the group file is modified manually to add complementary group > to users, the > command "Id -Gn" does not return all groups. Hmm, do you have taken a newer snapshot? I have first added supplementary group support on 1/6/2000. I have just proved it and AFAICS it works as expected. > To resolve this problem we intend to rewrite the "groups" command. Is > there a best > solution ? You need not to patch anything. It will be supported by the next net release anyway. Corinna -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com