Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 13:57:43 +0200 From: Paul Sokolovsky X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.32) S/N AB51B607 Reply-To: Paul Sokolovsky X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <14581.000324@is.lg.ua> To: "Wong, Homer" CC: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: We can get down to 30us resolution! In-reply-To: <5F4D0B436B7FD311B00C0008C724ADA6018C0AB1@ntmsg0009.corpmail.telstra.com.au> References: <5F4D0B436B7FD311B00C0008C724ADA6018C0AB1 AT ntmsg0009 DOT corpmail DOT telstra DOT com DOT au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Homer, Wong, Homer wrote: WH> Hi WH> Thanks to Tim, I have found the solution. On Windows NT and Windows 95 we WH> can use QueryPerformanceCounter and QueryPerformanceFrequency. Although it WH> is non-portable, it IS a way of getting better resolution time performance WH> on a Windows PC. For me, QueryPerformanceFrequency() on 95 gives very low frequency, far from any satisfactory. I want being able to count up to 400MHz on my PII-400 ;-) If that's what you want, you can look at http://www.is.lg.ua/~paul/devel/perf-count.html . Extra feature that it's not tied to any some windows and works on any Intel (i586+) system (tested on win32 & Linux). By the way, is this ontopic? -- Paul Sokolovsky, IT Specialist http://www.brainbench.com/transcript.jsp?pid=11135 -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com