Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 19:17:04 -0500 To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: [ANN] PW32 the (alternative) Posix-over-Win32 layer 0.3.0 released Message-ID: <20000313191704.A10551@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cgf AT cygnus DOT com, cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com References: <20000313180414 DOT 15800 DOT qmail AT web107 DOT yahoomail DOT com> <20000313180414 DOT 15800 DOT qmail AT web107 DOT yahoomail DOT com> <4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 20000313181326 DOT 00b8a590 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <38CD856B DOT BCF415C2 AT sigma6 DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.8i In-Reply-To: <38CD856B.BCF415C2@sigma6.com>; from jsturm@sigma6.com on Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 07:18:51PM -0500 On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 07:18:51PM -0500, Jeff Sturm wrote: >Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote: >> Personally, I think posting comparative data is useful to this list... > >So do I. If it mentions Cygwin, it's relevant... if it doesn't mention >Cygwin, it's not appropriate for this list... at least that's what >others seem to be saying, and I tend to agree. > >Speaking for myself... I don't mind the occaisional off-topic >announcement, but there is always a danger that they can snowball into a >long non-relevant discussion thread, subverting the real purpose of this >list. I've seen it happen elsewhere. So have I. That's my primary concern. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com