Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-ID: <38BEDC8D.82C32312@vinschen.de>
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 22:26:37 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna AT vinschen DOT de>
Reply-To: cygwin <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language: de,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject: Re: [ANN] perl5.5.660
References: <38BE0783 DOT 3D27966D AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 20 DOT 0003020125150 DOT 19895-100000 AT frontal DOT ibb DOT gatech DOT edu> <20000302131432 DOT C20207 AT cygnus DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Chris Faylor wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 01:53:31AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> >Same binary, but this time with CYGWIN='binmode tty ntea ntsec'
> 
> Corinna, shouldn't ntea and ntsec be mutually exclusive?  Should we
> change the DLL so that only one or the other can be active?

Maybe that isn't a good idea.
Some people are using FAT and NTFS and if you have to use ntsec
without ntea you don't have a chance to simulate permissions
on the FAT partitions.

Personally I would only change the set/get_file_attributes()
so that ntea is deactivated on NTFS partitions if ntsec is set.

Corinna

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com