Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 23:20:00 -0500 To: john AT thinman DOT com Cc: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: Security Documentation, SSH Message-ID: <20000116232000.A24739@cygnus.com> Mail-Followup-To: john AT thinman DOT com, cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com References: <20000117010222 DOT 28808 DOT qmail AT web803 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <20000117010222.28808.qmail@web803.mail.yahoo.com>; from john_van_v@yahoo.com on Sun, Jan 16, 2000 at 05:02:21PM -0800 Thank you for your thoughtful analysis and interesting story. As I mentioned, we will not be changing our statement regarding security since we believe that most people are not as expert as you appear to be and we do not feel that the current version of cygwin is secure enough for a non-expert user. On this we will have to agree to disagree. As I also hope I mentioned, it is not impossible that Red Hat will devote some time towards making Cygwin more secure. I do not see it happening anytime soon, however. Personally, I have been devoting my unsponsored Cygwin activities in other areas and do not see that changing soon either. I applaud your dedication to free software and wish you all of the best in that endeavor. cgf On Sun, Jan 16, 2000 at 05:02:21PM -0800, John van V. wrote: >Wow, maybe the language was a little strong but really folks... -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com