Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: "Andre Oliveira da Costa" To: "Chris Faylor" Cc: , Subject: RE: [mingw32] Re: [RFC] changing gcc default output executable na me (a.exe now) Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 17:58:48 -0200 Message-ID: <001201bf5ec9$c5a69790$8400000a@costa.cadenet.com.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: <20000114140728.A1858@cygnus.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Importance: Normal > -----Original Message----- > From: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com > [mailto:cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com]On Behalf Of Chris Faylor > Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 5:07 PM > To: Andre Oliveira da Costa > Cc: rbh00 AT netcom DOT com; cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com > Subject: Re: [mingw32] Re: [RFC] changing gcc default output executable > na me (a.exe now) > > We were talking about having gcc understand an environment variable or > command line switch causing it to avoid producing a .exe extension. It > is not going to be the default. Nothing is going to change unless you > set this. Looks fine to me, I can live with that ;) Let the default be the current behavior, and people who don't need/want .exe suffixes automatically appended to executables (like me) can have some variable set on their .bashrc files that would turn off this automatic feature. > Then, of course, the mailing list will be flooded with lots of "newbies" > who have found out about this nifty new environment variable and who > 1) have an older version of gcc which doesn't understand it, 2) > have makefiles > which add the .exe file explicitly, or 3) are facing in the wrong > direction > and are unable to see the computer screen. [1] they would be on the same situation we are today: they'd like not to have the .exe appended, but would have to tweak makefiles for that [2] these should work with no changes, since they are supposedly able to handle executables with the .exe suffix [3] these should be killed. Slowly ;) Regards, Andre -- André Oliveira da Costa (costa AT cade DOT com DOT br) -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com