Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 21:49:29 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: Ajit George Cc: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: STOP the RFC! Web poll for a.out vs a.exe vs foo.exe question Message-ID: <20000113214929.A11536@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Mail-Followup-To: Ajit George , cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com References: <000201bf5e22$dc83fe00$830120d0 AT bertie DOT kurianinc DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <000201bf5e22$dc83fe00$830120d0@bertie.kurianinc.com>; from gajit@kurianinc.com on Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 06:04:01PM -0600 On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 06:04:01PM -0600, Ajit George wrote: >In the poll, does 'file.exe' literally mean 'file.exe', or does it mean, for >example, 'prog.exe' when running 'gcc prog.c'? We're contemplating just having gcc output one specific file since it will be much less confusing to the users who accidentally type -o soemthing and find that their something.exe file has been completely overwritten! So the relevant makefile rule will now be: myprog.exe: gcc foo.o bar.o; mv file.exe myprog.exe Hmm. No. That can't be right because then every file would be named myprog.exe. I guess we'll have to work on this concept some more. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com