Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:00:20 -0500 From: Brent Williams Subject: Re: [mingw32] Re: [RFC] changing gcc default output executable name (a.exe now) In-reply-to: <387D5564.789AB78E@ctam.com.au> To: mingw32 AT egroups DOT com Cc: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-id: <387DDA7478.4F2ABRENT.WILLIAMS@send.mcit.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Becky! ver 1.25.07 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <387D5564 DOT 789AB78E AT ctam DOT com DOT au> > >Yep. I agree entirely. >An output of or even .exe would be justified on Unix boxes >also in my opinion. I don't know why Unix people still insist on making >things harder and more cryptic then they have to be. I think it's an ego >powertrip thing or something. I think the a.out was a carryover from the original compiler Dennis Ritchie wrote. Unix is cryptic at first, but once you get used to all those little commands, you can type faster. Typing 'cp' is a lot faster than typing 'copy'. It's rumored that Unix was never intended to be used outside of a lab environment. As far as cryptic goes, the WinAPI/Registry is about a cryptic as it gets. (or complicated may be a better word). Probably a result of having too many hands in the pie. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com