Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-ID: From: "Billinghurst, David (RTD)" To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: RE: [RFC] changing gcc default output executable name (a.exe now) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 06:06:13 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain I like this change. > -----Original Message----- > From: Mumit Khan [SMTP:khan AT NanoTech DOT Wisc DOT EDU] > Sent: Thursday, 13 January 2000 16:08 > To: Mingw32 discussion list at eGroups; cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com > Subject: [RFC] changing gcc default output executable name (a.exe > now) > > > Are people happy/ok with the fact that gcc on win32 produces a program > called a.exe by default? For example, > > $ gcc foo.c > > will create a.exe. This is of course not really expected on DOS/Windows > world, and causes all sorts of confusion. Also, this is simply lame even > on Unix, and this historical bit should've disappeared long ago, but > won't since it's a convention now. > > I'd like to move to creating .exe, where is the first file > on the list you provided to gcc. > > $ gcc foo1.c foo2.c foo3.c > > will produce foo1.exe, not a.exe as it does now. > > Is this something we should change?? > > Regards, > Mumit > > > > -- > Want to unsubscribe from this list? > Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com