Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-Id: <199912061554.JAA15146@hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu> To: stefan cc: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: More than 64 sockets ? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 05 Dec 1999 23:01:24 +0100." Date: Mon, 06 Dec 1999 09:54:39 -0600 From: Mumit Khan stefan writes: > Hello, > > we were porting a server software to Win9x/NT and had to notice that you > cannot accept() more than 64 sockets. Why is this ? Can anyone help us ? The underlying OS API, WaitForMultipleObjects, has a limit of 64 handles it can wait on, and that's probably the reason. There are tricks to get around it, but it requires creating multiple threads. Not pretty. Go to the MSDN docs on www.microsoft.com and search for 64 *and* Wait and see if it turns up; also, search comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.win32 on www.deja.com, where this is usually beated to death. Look for the article by Richter that shows the multiple thread implementation, where each new thread is started to handle the extra batches of 64 handles to wait for -- this is something Cygwin should implement (uh oh, do I hear the "feel free to submit patches" response ;-). > Secondly we would like to know how to link the program without > cygwin1.dll. The link option -mno-cygwin doesnt work properly. Afterwards > there still some symbols missing. Is there a more informational document > for this kind of topic ? See my mno-cygwin howto at http://www.xraylith.wisc.edu/~khan/software/gnu-win32/#mno-cygwin Regards, Mumit -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com