Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-ID: <000201bf32e7$b61f4500$1b003cd4@theunknown> From: "s.rekow" To: "Allan S Iverson" , "Cygwin Mail List" References: <004701bf3179$cf3dc940$1638aec7 AT discordian> Subject: Re: Help compiling TCL 8.0.3 with GCC-2.95.2 Upgrade Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 17:12:24 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211 > I am trying to compile TCL 8.0.4 using Cygwin b20 with GCC-2.95.2 downloaded from > www.xraylith.wisc.edu/~khan/software/gnu-win32/. maybe off-topic but: Jeffrey Hobbs, tcl-corehacker at scriptics.com wrote somewhere: "There is actually a buglet in 8.0.4 (not 8.0.5) and 8.1-8.2.0 (fixed in 8.2.1) where the above cases are equal (both will be compiled). Tcl was being overaggressive in trying to compile procs, and was deciding that simple $vars are OK to compile in. This is actually not true, since expr has always had double-evaluation semantics. 8.0.5 and 8.2.1+ will behave as expected, the others will not." tcl8.0.5 is the last patchlvl for 8.0, tcl8.1 - 8.2.0 are not very stable and tcl8.2.2 also fixed a bunch of memleaks uhm, maybe you should use tcl8.0.5 or 8.2.2? Regards, S.Rekow -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com