Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Reply-To: From: "Suhaib Siddiqi" To: , "Charles S. Wilson" Subject: RE: RedHat acquisition of Cygnus??? Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 17:23:42 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-reply-to: <19991110164412.D15242@cygnus.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal To add a comment about Cygwin and RedHat. Though not relevant RedHat opened a new Tech Office in Durham, which will be based upon Open Source concept and would look into various technologies for Open Source. RedHat commintted a few million Dollars for it. According to our local new papers (News and Observer) RedHat is certainly interested in getting other Open Source technologies and opening a new office (so called Open Source Research Center) is the first step in that direction. Suhaib > -----Original Message----- > From: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com > [mailto:cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com]On Behalf Of > Chris Faylor > Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 1999 4:44 PM > To: Charles S. Wilson > Cc: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com > Subject: Re: RedHat acquisition of Cygnus??? > > > On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 10:27:21AM -0500, Charles S. Wilson wrote: > >According to the following *RUMOR* posted on slashdot, > >http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=99/11/10/0823222, > RedHat has inked a > >deal to acquire Cygnus. Now, I realize that, if true, > Cygnus employees > >cannot comment. However, I'm not a Cygnus employee. > > Hey, I'll comment! The first I heard about this was on > SlashDot, too. > I don't have any inside scoop on what's going on but, > then, I wouldn't > expect to know about this at my level in the company (I'm > a first line > engineering manager/engineer). > > To say that I was surprised to see the announcement would > be a slight > understatement. > > >I think this is a stupid move for both companies. Yeesh > - what is it > >with corporations these days? Are acquisitions of other companies > >outside their core competency area the only way to grow? > Is Cygnus > >looking at RedHat's vast market capitalization as a > means of hiring > >enough lawyers to defend against MS' inevitable lawsuit > (since MS will > >sue anyone who has a pulse and sells "platform" software)? > > > >What do you think? > > Well, we have a pretty good relationship with Microsoft > so I don't think > we're too worried about being sued. > > I'm sure that there are a number of reasons to consider > such a merger. > There are certainly parts of Cygnus that would fit very well into > RedHat's core competencies and vice-versa. gcc and gdb > come to mind. > > Of course, my initial thought when I heard this was "What > about Cygwin?" > I guess you could stretch things a little to say that > Cygwin, being UNIX > on Windows is sorta a little like linux but I can still worry... > > >If the moderator considers this offtopic, then I > apologize for posting > >it -- and please move discussion to the slashdot forum. > However, I > >thought it was of interest to cygwin users. > > I don't consider this off-topic. I'd love to hear > comments about this. > > cgf > > -- > Want to unsubscribe from this list? > Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com > -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com