Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From: N8TM AT aol DOT com
Message-ID: <0.90856f6.2552e7b4@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 08:44:20 EST
Subject: Re: Performance of g77 in Cygwin CD
To: alex DOT klinsky AT scientist DOT com, cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
CC: sssiddiqi AT ipass DOT net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 11/4/99 12:22:33 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
alex DOT klinsky AT scientist DOT com writes:

> As the backend is new on the Cygwin 1.0 CD i have a few questions>
>  
>  1. Is the performance improved for g77 ?
 I would second Suhaib's recommendation to build and install gcc-2.95.2.  I 
have done this in my B21 snapshot installations.  I first installed 
make-3.77.  There is a minor patch required to make libf2c/libU77/[de]time_.c 
consistent with the new <windows.h>, and it's worth while to make sure that 
.p2align is configured, even though it's not fully effective because cygwin 
does not maintain the required 128-bit stack alignment.  I think this 
requires installation of a binutils snapshot.  I am getting significantly 
better performance on my applications than I was getting with LF95, although 
this varies according to circumstances.


Tim
tprince AT computer DOT org

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com