Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: Steve Jorgensen Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 12:40:55 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199910261840.MAA09312@benson> To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: X11 for cygwin CD 1.0 I know that this list has been told to use the x11r6.4-cygwin-ss-dev.tar.gz version of Xwindows for the cygwin 1.0 cd, but before it was discussed on this list, I found the pre-alpha-xfree-cygwin-b20.1.tar.bz2 version. While the Xserver itself is in the pre-alpha stages, the libraries and clients seem to work as well or better than the x11r6.4-cygwin-ss-dev.tar.gz version. Is there some reason why we should not use this pre-alpha-xfree-cygwin-b20.1 version? The x11r6.4-cygwin-ss-dev.tar.gz version can't run xterm, it just complains about not being able to find an appropriate termcap entry, even after I added one. Also the header files produce tons of annoying warnings, because they lack return types on several function declarations, which produce warnings about assuming int for the return type. I thinking about sticking with the pre-alpha version, because the above reasons, but I wanted to make sure there aren't any hidden gotcha's.. :) Thanks for any information. Steve -- ----------------------------------------------------------- Steven Jorgensen steve AT khoral DOT com steve AT haunt DOT com ------------------------------+---------------------------- Khoral Research Inc. | PHONE: (505) 837-6500 6200 Uptown Blvd, Suite 200 | FAX: (505) 881-3842 Albuquerque, NM 87110 | URL: http://www.khoral.com/ ----------------------------------------------------------- -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com