Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 22:42:30 +0300 From: Paul Sokolovsky X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.32) S/N 34D3AC61 Reply-To: Paul Sokolovsky X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <4946.991007@is.lg.ua> To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re[2]: Speed In-reply-To: <0.ee8f9318.252d560f@aol.com> References: <0 DOT ee8f9318 DOT 252d560f AT aol DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello N8TM, N8TM AT aol DOT com wrote: >> Is there any way to make cygwin programs (I mean these from the package: Nac> gcc, >> awk, bash, grep, etc.) to work faster ? Nac> Disconnect from the network and simplify your Path. Change OS versions. I Nac> just demonstrated a factor of 3 under NT4 between configure scripts while Nac> connected to a network and while disconnected. W2K is faster in either case. Nac> But it's quite a struggle for Windows to imitate linux. Yes, but it's still can be done faster. My own experiments show that there're operations which Win32 can perform only 2 times slower than Linux! Isn't it bright? Forks are still hundreds times slower ;-( Nac> Tim Nac> tprince AT computer DOT org Nac> -- Best regards, Paul mailto:paul-ml AT is DOT lg DOT ua -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com