Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-ID: <37C98524.6A62A265@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 15:08:20 -0400 From: "Charles S. Wilson" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: New snapshots and old binaries Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I want to update my cygwin environment to the newer snapshots, for two reasons: 1) to make sure that perl5.6(pre) will build and execute properly with cygwinB21(pre) while there's still time to fix perl5.6 / cygwinB21. 2) to use Sergey's port of ssh-2.0.13 My question: If I do switch over to the newer snapshots, by unpacking cygwin-inst-* over my current setup and fixing gcc-2.95 using Mumit's gcc-2.95-dev-ss.tar.gz, how badly will this break my cygwin environment? (I know that the i586-cygwin32 directory has changed its name to i586-pc-cygwin32, but that's fairly minor from a user perspective). I have Arlindo daSilva's X11 libs (for B20) installed, Andy Piper's /usr/local (for B20), gcc-2.95, Sergey's remote package, libmysql, msql-2.0.5, and a number of binaries that I have compiled against B20.1. Will I need to recompile ALL of these libraries and executables before my system returns to "normal", or what? --Chuck -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com