Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-ID: <65CAA822B707D211AD430008C7F40FED748457@EXCHANGERSW2> From: "McCunney, Dennis" To: "'DJ Delorie'" Cc: "'cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com'" Subject: RE: cygwin vs. MKS Toolkit Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 18:38:42 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > -----Original Message----- > From: DJ Delorie [mailto:dj AT delorie DOT com] > Sent: Friday, August 20, 1999 6:29 PM > To: DMcCunney AT roper DOT com > Cc: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com > Subject: Re: cygwin vs. MKS Toolkit > > > I doubt it, as the GNU liscense would likely forbid it, > > If the GPL forbid MKS from doing it, it would forbid Cygnus from doing > it too, and we do it all the time. You just have to follow certain > requirements when you use GPL'd code, but you aren't prevented from > doing stuff with it. > > Remember that the FSF owns the copyright on most of the core GNU > programs. All other vendors shipping GNU tools, from Redhat to Cygnus > to (gasp if it happened) Microsoft would be equivalent as far as what > they are allowed/required/forbidden to do. Sure. You resell packaged GNU code, but you make source available, and technically, I believe you aren't charging for the software itself - you're charging for the packaging, polish, and support. All legit. My basic point was that I don't believe MKS is using GNU source, and they have never, to my knowledge, offered any source for any of their products. As I understand it, using GNU code would require them to do so. ______ Dennis -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com