Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Reply-To: From: "Suhaib M. Siddiqi" To: "Cygwin AT Sourceware. Cygnus. Com" Subject: FW: Description of the new 'ntsec' feature Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 21:20:36 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211 Importance: Normal > Jim & Jenn Dumser wrote: > > [...] > > It would help to know exactly when these features were added to the > > snapshots. I grabbed 990815 since it was the latest, but many programs > > (vim, etc.) just core dump with it. (I'm running NT4 SP5.) > > [...] > > It's part of the snapshots since 25-May. If you think that the ntsec > feature is the reason for the core dumps you have two choices: > > - Send me an strace > - set CYGWIN=nontsec In my hands NTSEC had been very annoying. I get all the time those pinfo_proc kill at 1000 blah blah. I did not understand the philosophy behind NTSEC. Cygwin is a development tool not a multiuser UNIX login system, thus I am not sure implementing all the UNIX traditional security features would be helpfull for development tools. Suhaib > > I'm using ntsec since I begun to develop it (since mid of January) and > I'm using vim, too. I don't have any core dump with it. This should not > imply, that I believe, ntsec is error free! Moreover, ntsec is a widely > discussable feature and it will not be useful for everyone. > > Regards, > Corinna > > > > -- > Want to unsubscribe from this list? > Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com > -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com