Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>,
	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From: N8TM AT aol DOT com
Message-ID: <72cb8deb.24ec04e8@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 08:45:28 EDT
Subject: Re: Cygwin performance projections
To: brendan AT dgs DOT monash DOT edu DOT au, cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows sub 15

In a message dated 8/17/99 11:50:01 PM PST, brendan AT dgs DOT monash DOT edu DOT au writes:

> What are the bottle necks ?
The greatest performance problem I see is the inability to get aligned local 
data storage.  This one is shared by commercial Windows compilers.

>What kind of performance increases are expected in the next release

Windows 2000 beta 3 gives a good performance increase over NT4 and W95.

Tim
tprince AT computer DOT org

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com