Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: "Josh Baudhuin" To: Subject: RE: Nutcracker Vs cygwin Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 09:22:40 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <37B19B04.1AB8C53A@inspirepharm.com> u/win has GNU tools support, doesn't it? Mumit Khan has ported egcs to that environment as well. Or do you refer to something else... -----Original Message----- From: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com [mailto:cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com]On Behalf Of Suhaib M. Siddiqi Sent: Wednesday, 11 August 1999 8:47 am To: ssiddiqi AT ipass DOT net; cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: Nutcracker Vs cygwin Parr, Ian D wrote: > > Has anyone performed an evaluation/comparison of both products ? > Would they care to share their findings ? > > Regards > > Ian Parr Yes. Bascially you are on your own. NutCracker(NC), so does UWIN, lacks the GNU tools support. That means most of the source codes can be compiled with less efforts with Cygwin. Also the X Windows system support is same in NC, you need their X-server to run the applications. You also need to their versions of X11 and MOTIF to port. In Cygwin you have access to all these tools (X11) with much less restrictions. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com